Interest Rate - Up again
On August 8 2007, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA)
announced an increase of 0.25% on interest rate to 6.5%. It was unwelcoming
news to everybody who has debt in hand, particularly those with standard
variable rate arrangement.
A lot of angry family now feeling the pinches a
little more harder on-yet-to-heal bruises inflicted by the previous rise of
interest rate on last November at the same rate.
Every government has its own fiscal policy to manage their country's economy.
Fiscal policy has 2 main components; tax and government spending. Like many
governments in the world, Australia has RBA to champion the F1 of economy. In
responding to many complex subcomponents that make up the taxes and government
spending, a fiscal policy can expand or contract accordingly. Hence the
Expansionary Fiscal Policy and Contractionary Fiscal Policy.
When do Fiscal Policy contracts? It is when there is a need to dilute the
economy of a country. Expansionary Fiscal policy is the direct opposite. How do
they dilute the economy? Simply raise the tax and lower the government spending
(less road improvement, less hospital, less benefits, etc) - again the opposite
for expansionary fiscal policy.
By now you might guess, Australia has been adopting Expansionary Fiscal Policy.
Where tax has been lowered consistently over the years and the government
spending are increased. Here is a simple formula to make it clearer.
Y = C(y-t) + I + G + NX where
Y = GDP
C = Consumption Spending
y = net income or GDP
t = tax
I = Investment
G = Government Spending
NX = Net Export
Assuming everything else remain the same, expansionary fiscal policy will
generally make a prosperous economy more prosper. With t, tax lowered and, G,
government spending increased will see an economy, Y or GDP grow.
I think you are beginning to see that the 'real' purpose of tax cuts. They are
not meant out of generosity for the people. It is meant to stimulate the
economy and the people have indirectly benefited from it. How you may ask? Look
at the formula where C(t-y) = disposable income = income after tax = net
income. The more you have, the more you spend, it is human nature in broad
spectrum. The more the people spend, the bigger subcomponent C gets, hence a
stimulated GDP is being introduced. The current ruling government of Australia,
the Liberal party announced tax reform in year 2000, where tax cuts are being
envisaged to occur for the next four years on every budget year. Tax cut has
only one main purpose that is to stimulate GDP.
Australian Prime Minister was in the cooking pot and quoted after promising
keeping the interest rates at record low in his previous election campaign
"I would say to voters...[Liberal is better in] finely balanced in
challenge of economic management and economy policy at a time of great
prosperity". Australian can't blame him for the rise of interest. It is
because he not the man who has the say on interest rates movement. The problem
was he was not telling the 'whole' truth that it is the RBA who runs the
interest rate blockbuster. Many people do not know that. So Australians do need
to know simple Macroeconomics than believing any politicians promising the
upcoming days of prosperity.
So how does interest rate come into the picture? Behind the attempt to stimulate
the economy, Expansionary Fiscal Policy hike up interest rate as well. Mr John
Howard is telling the some truth that things will get more expensive, that it
is a cost of being prosperous nation. If things get expensive directly related
to inflation? Yes and no – for now as things become costlier, the demand for
money grows. As people need more money when it is scarce - they will get loans
to finance their growing consumption. More demand for money will stimulate the
rise interest of interest rate.
More coming on later edition.
Comments